MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Reply on CC1

2025· peer-review· en· W4414224063 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nakul N. Karle

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepeer-review
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSignaling Pathways in Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCeilometerSmokeHYSPLITPlumeAir quality indexSatelliteParticulatesAerosol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<strong class="journal-contentHeaderColor">Abstract.</strong> The 2023 Canadian wildfires yielded record-breaking emissions that were transported long distances over large sections of the mid-Atlantic region, significantly impacting regional surface air quality. In this study, we analyzed the effect of long-distance transported wildfire smoke on the Baltimore-Washington Corridor (BWC), a highly populated and industrialized metropolitan region prone to air quality exceedances. Central to the analysis is the Vaisala CL61 ceilometer in Beltsville (suburban BWC), whose <em>linear depolarization rati</em>o (LDR) profiles provide a continuous, altitude-resolved fingerprint for distinguishing wildfire smoke from locally generated urban aerosols. By combining the LDR-derived with satellite imagery, surface air quality observations, and NOAA HYSPLIT trajectory analysis, we analyzed four discrete smoke events to characterize smoke's vertical distribution and interaction with the planetary boundary layer (PBL). One of the cases showed that the timing of smoke plume descent in relation to synoptic frontal passage was decisive in determining its impact on air quality. In contrast, those events with well-mixed smoke in the PBL during the advection-driven conditions exhibited a clear deterioration in air quality near the surface, with particulate levels exceeding the regulation threshold. The results underscore the importance of accurately representing vertical mixing in smoke forecasts and illustrate the added value of routine ceilometer LDR measurements for real-time identification of lofted smoke plumes &ndash; information not attainable from column-integrated satellite products or surface monitors alone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSignaling Pathways in DiseaseFrench-language works237,207