MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414227048 · doi:10.2118/226929-ms

Environmental Impact Mitigation Through Innovational Waste Gas Incineration

2025· article· en· W4414227048 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
R. BuKhamseen, Ahmed M. Nassef, K. Bakir, H. Alshrief, Sohier Fahmy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicOil, Gas, and Environmental Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIncinerationHazardous wasteRenewable energyLife-cycle assessmentMobile incineratorEnvironmental impact assessmentGreenhouse gasSustainabilityCombustion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper evaluates an incinerator system that integrates advanced waste gas incineration with renewable energy aiming to optimize waste management reduce emissions. The study explores this technology's capacity to address the specific needs of the petroleum industry, including handling hazardous waste and improving sustainability in regions like the UAE & KSA. The development involved a comprehensive approach combining computational modelling (CFD), prototype testing, and field trials, utilizing CFD simulations for combustion process refinement. A prototype was deployed for the first time in the region in Abu Dhabi field, in close proximity to a populated area, where elimination of visual flare, emissions and odours was required, while incorporating solar energy for ignition. Performance metrics such as emission levels, energy efficiency, and adaptability to diverse waste streams were rigorously tested to ensure compliance with stringent environmental and industry standards. A life cycle assessment (LCA) was also conducted to evaluate the system’s holistic environmental impact. The hybrid incinerator demonstrated remarkable results, achieving over 99.9% total hydrocarbon (including Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and BTEX compounds) destruction efficiency, effectively eliminating free carbon particles and significantly reducing CO emissions to below 10 ppm. The system proved capable of safely handling diverse hazardous gas streams, including H2S. Economically, it offers a high return on investment (ROI) due to notably lower construction costs compared to conventional enclosed flare systems that can achieve the same results. These findings suggest the incinerator can significantly reduce the petroleum industry's environmental footprint, promote energy recovery, and align with circular economic principles. The system meets and exceeds regulations from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Alberta Energy Regulator (AER), Saskatchewan MOE regulations, and aligns with the UAE Net Zero by 2050 objectives. And while the use of energy recovery is from generated heat and converting it into usable energy is achieved in other industries, we hope that one day we can incorporate these technologies in the oil and gas industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.230
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOil, Gas, and Environmental IssuesFrench-language works237,207