MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414229539 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3610367

EIDS-DTL: Edge-Based Intrusion Detection System for IoUAVs Using Metaheuristic Task Optimization and Deep Transfer Learning

2025· article· en· W4414229539 on OpenAlexaff
Farhan Ullah, Gautam Srivastava, Leonardo Mostarda, Jawad Ahmad

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntrusion detection systemEdge computingBenchmark (surveying)Transfer of learningEdge deviceEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionMetaheuristicFeature extractionDeep learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The integration of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) with the Internet of Things (IoT), also known as IoUAVs, facilitates real-time data transmission and coordinated operations in critical applications such as smart agriculture, disaster response, and infrastructure monitoring. The growing development of IoT has, however, made IoUAVs vulnerable to emerging cyberattacks that could disrupt these essential services. Deep learning can detect hidden attack patterns, but power and processing constraints make it challenging for resource-constrained IoUAVs. Edge computing offloads real-time analysis tasks, but optimizing workloads with unpredictable connectivity and high latency requirements for intrusion detection remains challenging. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a novel Edge-Based Intrusion Detection System (EIDS) that introduces two key innovations. We developed a metaheuristic task optimization technique for the IoUAV edge environment to efficiently manage computational loads and resources. Second, a Deep Transfer Learning (DTL) technique optimized for intrusion detection minimizes training time and computational overhead. Our novel EIDS-DTL technology synergistically incorporates these components for powerful intrusion detection. Our method optimizes feature extraction from IoUAV network traffic by purifying, filtering, and normalizing data. By fine-tuning pre-trained models, the system achieves high accuracy in identifying malicious activity while ensuring optimal performance in resource-constrained environments. Experimental results on two benchmark datasets demonstrate classification accuracies of 98.95% and 99.27%, outperforming existing approaches by up to 5% in accuracy while maintaining high precision, recall, and F1 scores. The proposed method enhances accuracy and efficiency, providing an effective solution for IoUAV security and edge optimization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score0.636

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207