MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414229954 · doi:10.1109/jsac.2025.3610448

A Predictive Integrated Sensing, Communication, and Computation Over-the-Air Approach for IoV: Optimization and Trade-Off Analysis

2025· article· en· W4414229954 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Sensor Networks and Detection Algorithms
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersScience and Technology Innovation Foundation of HarbinNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBeamformingTelecommunications linkComputationTransmitter power outputMaximizationOptimization problemKalman filterReliability (semiconductor)Multiplexing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integrated Sensing, Communication, and Computation (ISCC) has the potential to meet diverse requirements of Internet of Vehicles (IoV), such as high reliability and low power consumption. However, existing works have not fully considered the problems of unreliable communication links and inefficient data processing under resource constraints in non-ideal environments. To address these issues, this paper proposes a predictive Integrated Sensing, Communication and Computation Over-the-Air (ISCCO) approach based on Orthogonal Time Frequency Space (OTFS) modulation. It takes high Doppler shifts, network dynamics, and resource constraints into account. In particular, the Road Side Unit (RSU) performs target tracking while communicating with the downlink users through Space Division Multiplexing (SDM), and receives the transmission results of the uplink. For the downlink, a predictive beamforming approach based on Extended Kalman Filtering (EKF) is employed, while Over-the-Air computation (AirComp) is utilized for the uplink. The transmit power and receive beamformer at the RSU, along with the transmit power of the uplink users, are jointly optimized through two formulated optimization problems: sensing performance maximization and power consumption minimization. To solve these problems, we adopt an Alternating Optimization (AO)-based algorithm for finding the local optimal solution. Simulation results validate the effectiveness of the AO-based algorithm, and the analysis of the trade-offs between multi-dimensional performance of ISCC and power consumption is conducted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score0.772

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it