MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414230418 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2025.3610454

Two-Dimensional DPS-BEM Based Channel Estimation for MIMO OTFS Systems

2025· article· en· W4414230418 on OpenAlexafffund
Ali Mohebbi, M. Omair Ahmad

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPAPR reduction in OFDM
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMIMOChannel (broadcasting)Representation (politics)Basis (linear algebra)Reduction (mathematics)Computational complexity theoryMean squared errorScheme (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a novel doubly selective channel estimation (CE) scheme is proposed for multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) systems. Using the two-dimensional (2D) discrete prolate spheroidal basis expansion model (DPS-BEM), a new analytical representation of the MIMO channel is derived in the delay-Doppler domain. This results in a significant reduction of the number of unknown parameters required for CE compared to methods that directly estimate the channel. Moreover, inspired by the pilot structure in recent works, a new low-overhead pilot scheme is introduced which is capable of effectively capturing the channel's temporal variations and enhancing the estimation performance of the proposed method. The accuracy of the proposed 2D DPS-BEM CE method is evaluated by deriving the theoretical Cramer-Rao lower bound, which shows a low estimation error. Also, the proposed method's computational complexity is calculated and compared with other recent techniques, demonstrating lower complexity. Simulation results further validate that the proposed method outperforms the existing CE approaches in terms of normalized mean squared error and bit error rate, verifying the effectiveness of the proposed 2D DPS-BEM MIMO channel representation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicPAPR reduction in OFDMFrench-language works237,207