Genome assembly of five Tephritid species for the enhancement of the Sterile Insect Technique
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Tephritidae insect pests account for extensive crop damage and yield losses globally. Modern, sustainable pest management approaches are species-specific and, therefore, high-quality genome assemblies are required for their application. Here, we present chromosome-level assemblies for five members of the Tephritidae family: Anastrepha fraterculus, Anastrepha ludens, Bactrocera dorsalis, Bactrocera zonata and Zeugodacus cucurbitae . The assemblies used long read sequencing polished with short read sequencing and scaffolded using Hi-C (chromatin conformation capture) sequencing. Prior to scaffolding the assembly deduplication was performed to separate a primary assembly and an alternate assembly, and each was then scaffolded independently. The scaffolded assemblies reached N50 length in the range of 60Mb to 120Mb. The scaffolded assemblies were verified with BUSCO and completeness was in the range 97% to 98.5% and had very low duplicated, fragmented and missing orthologs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it