MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414239275 · doi:10.18435/vamp29411

First occurrence of the urocordylid Ctenerpeton remex from the Mazon Creek Lagerstätte, Illinois, USA

2025· article· en· W4414239275 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Blue M. Byrnes, John R. Bolt, Arjan Mann

Bibliographic record

VenueVertebrate Anatomy Morphology Palaeontology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicEvolution and Paleontology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTetrapod (structure)CarboniferousFaunaPaleozoicSPINE (molecular biology)ConcretionAssemblage (archaeology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite being one of the most complete records of a paleozoic ecosystem, tetrapod fossils at the Mazon Creek Lagerstätte remain relatively rare compared to other contemporary late Carboniferous localities, making new additions to the fauna particularly important. Here we report a new concretion from Mazon Creek that contains a series of articulated caudal vertebrae of the early tetrapod Ctenerpeton remex. It is differentiated from Ptyonius and other nectrideans by the characteristics of its neural and haemal spines and arches, most notably the anterior and posterior projections on the haemal arches, the accessory zygapophyses on the neural arch, and the size and shape of the spines compared to known specimens of other urocordylids and nectrideans. The addition of Ctenerpeton remex to the Mazon Creek tetrapod assemblage increases the known diversity of nectrideans in this fauna and potentially aids in our understanding of the different environments inhabited by urocordylids in the late Carboniferous.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVertebrate Anatomy Morphology PalaeontologySame topicEvolution and Paleontology StudiesFrench-language works237,207