MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414239598 · doi:10.22329/cjpp.v11i1.9267

Expanding Harm Reduction to Treat Severe and Enduring Anorexia Nervosa

2024· article· en· W4414239598 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Practical Philosophy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEating Disorders and Behaviors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDignityAutonomyAnorexia nervosaHarmHarm reductionFoundation (evidence)Do no harmPersonal autonomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper advocates for expanding harm reduction (HR) concepts to treat Severe and Enduring Anorexia Nervosa (SE-AN). It argues that HR, traditionally applied in drug use contexts, can be adapted for SE-AN. Drawing on Stoljar’s work (2020), It shows that a deontological foundation for HR can promote dignity and autonomy in SE-AN treatment by providing a safe space and allowing individuals to choose their treatment. To understand HR’s application to SE-AN, it examines analogies and potential disanalogies with drug use. Finally, it suggests that using HR in SE-AN justifies treatments based on dignity and autonomy which are essential for ethical care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.214
Threshold uncertainty score0.855

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it