Linking Career Calling Profiles to Ecological Considerations in Vocational Behaviors, Ecological Worries and Nature Connectedness
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Career calling is a work orientation that refers to a sense of purpose that leads a person toward a personally fulfilling and socially significant engagement. It could be argued that the prosocial nature of calling might entail caring for the environment. Indeed, studies have linked calling to some pro-environmental behaviors. However, little attention has been devoted to understanding intraindividual patterns of calling and how configurations of calling dimensions might help understand the association with environmental attitudes. This study aimed to identify distinct career calling profiles and to examine their association with ecological considerations in vocational behaviors, ecological worries and nature connectedness. Latent profile analysis was conducted using data from a sample of French-Canadian adults ( N = 622). Results revealed four quantitively and qualitatively distinct profiles. Participants from the two profiles characterized by an above-average level of calling report higher levels of environmental attitudes than those profiles with below-average level of calling, as expected. These results support the importance of adopting a person-centered approach to understand calling considering that career calling profiles might reflect different work orientation. Moreover, this research suggests with whom it might be beneficial to integrate ecological considerations into career counseling practices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it