Review of Triply Periodic Minimal Surface (TPMS) Structures for Cooling Heat Sinks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This review paper deals with Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces (TPMS) and lattice structures as a new generation of heat exchangers. Especially, their manufacturing is becoming feasible with technological progress. While some intricate structures are fabricated, challenges persist concerning manufacturing limitations, cost-effectiveness, and performance under transient operating conditions. Studies reported that these complex geometries, such as diamond, gyroid, and hexagonal lattices, outperform traditional finned and porous materials in thermal management, particularly under forced and turbulent convection regimes. However, TPMS necessitates the optimization of geometric parameters such as cell size, porosity, and topology stretching. The complex geometries enhance uniform heat exchange and reduce thermal boundary layers. Moreover, the integration of high thermal conductivity materials (e.g., aluminum and silver) and advanced coolants (including nanofluids and ethylene glycol mixtures) further improves performance. However, the drawback of complex geometries, confirmed by both numerical and experimental investigations, is the critical trade-off between heat transfer performance and pressure drop. The potential of TPMS-based heatsinks transpires as a trend for next-generation thermal management systems, besides identifying key directions for future research, including design optimization, Multiphysics modeling, and practical implementation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".