MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414240567 · doi:10.22329/cjpp.v12i1.10455

PREFACE TO VOL. 12, NO. 1 (2025) CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL PHILOSOPHY: TOPICS IN PRACTICAL PHILOSOPHY: ISSUES AND PERSPECTIVES

2025· article· en· W4414240567 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Practical Philosophy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEthics in medical practice
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNormative

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this Volume, we are pleased to present five papers, one on a topic which permeates the whole of informational and normative discourse, the “fact-value” distinction, another on the One Health Approach in the Philippines, and three with a Canadian focus. Students of the late Alasdair MacIntyre (1929-2025) will be pleased to know that two of the papers deal with aspects of his philosophy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.244
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.244
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.018
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.144
GPT teacher head0.474
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it