MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Autophagy And Apoptosis After Foot And Neck Cooling In Older Adults Exposed To Extreme Heat

2025· article· en· W4414243946 on OpenAlexaffabout
James J. McCormick, Kelli E. King, Robert D. Meade, Emma R. McCourt, Glen P. Kenny

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutophagyApoptosisPeripheral blood mononuclear cellFoot (prosody)Core temperaturePeripheralHyperthermiaProgrammed cell death

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We recently showed that a brief 2 h access to air conditioning during a 9 h simulated heat wave caused a robust reduction in core temperature in older adults. However, the changes were transient with core temperature returning to levels similar to their non-cooled counterparts within 2 h of re-entry to the heat. However, it did preserve cytoprotective autophagy and prevented apoptotic cell death, that could play a critical role in reducing heat-induced cellular injury. It remains unclear if alternative home-based cooling interventions (e.g., foot immersion, cool wet towels on the neck) would elicit comparable benefits. PURPOSE: To evaluate cellular responses in older adults during a prolonged heat wave simulation while either immersing the feet in cool water with and without applying a cool wet towel to the neck compared to no-cooling. METHODS: 17 participants (9 females, median age 72 [IRQ, 69-74] years) completed 3, 6 h heat exposures at 38 °C (35% relative humidity) with either no-cooling (control), submersion of the feet (mid-calf) in 20 °C water for the last 40-min of each hour or foot immersion with a cool wet towel (20 °C) around the neck. Core (rectal) temperature was measured continuously, while proteins associated with autophagy (LC3-II) and apoptosis (caspase-3) were assessed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells before and after each exposure via Western blot. Data are presented as relative quantity (RQ) from baseline and were analyzed via a one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Elevations in core temperature were not different between conditions (+1.1 °C; all P > 0.99). No differences in LC3-II were observed following foot immersion with (2.0 RQ [SD 1.9]) or without neck cooling (1.2 RQ [0.4]) compared to no-cooling (1.7 RQ [1.1]; both P ≥ 0.21). Similarly, caspase-3 did not differ from no-cooling at end-exposure (1.3 RQ [0.4]) with either cooling intervention (without neck cooling: 1.39 RQ [0.83]; with neck cooling: 1.42 RQ [0.8]; P ≥ 0.91). CONCLUSION: Foot immersion with and without neck cooling had minimal impact on autophagy or apoptosis during a 6 h passive heat exposure and therefore, may not be effective in alleviating cellular stress in older adults when exposed to extreme heat. Supported by: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Health Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicClimate Change and Health Impacts→French-language works237,207→