Relative Uplift Rates Along the Central Mindoro Fault, Philippines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Central Mindoro Fault (CMF) is a major active oblique, sinistral strike-slip fault within the Philippine archipelago that accommodates the oblique convergence between the Philippine Sea Plate (PSP) and the Sunda Plate (SP). This study focused on assessing the spatial distribution of relative uplift rates along the CMF by calculating multiple geomorphic indices (elongation ratio, volume-to-area-ratio, valley floor width-to-height ratio, hypsometric integral, and normalized steepness index) and interpreting these values in the context of any along-strike variations in geology and climate, as well as the context of the CMF’s kinematics. We observed 2 characteristics of spatial distributions of relative uplift rates: (1) at least 20–30 km-long high uplift rate sections in the northwestern end of the CMF-bound mountain range (CMF segment I), and (2) at most, CMF-wide moderate to high uplift rates. This trend matches the geomorphic-based cumulative fault offset measurements distribution, possibly indicating consistent kinematics and an overall nearly-uniform stress-field since at least the Pleistocene. Based on the spatial distribution of areas with high relative uplift rates highlighted by this study, future efforts to assess the CMF’s seismogenic capability should focus on segments I and III.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".