MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414247416 · doi:10.3390/electronics14183662

DVIOR: Dynamic Vertical and Low-Intensity Outlier Removal for Efficient Snow Noise Removal from LiDAR Point Clouds in Adverse Weather

2025· article· en· W4414247416 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Guanqiang Ruan, Fanhao Kong, Chenglin Ding, Kuo Yang, Tao Hu, Rong Yan

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdverse weatherOutlierSnowLidarFilter (signal processing)Noise (video)Snow removal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the advancement of autonomous driving technology, the performance of LiDAR in adverse weather conditions has garnered increasing attention. Traditional denoising algorithms, including intensity-based methods like LIOR (a representative intensity-based filter that relies solely on signal intensity), have limited effectiveness in handling snow noise, especially in removing dynamic noise points and distinguishing them from environmental features. This paper proposes a Dynamic Vertical and Low-Intensity Outlier Removal (DVIOR) algorithm, specifically designed to optimize LiDAR point cloud data under snowy conditions. The DVIOR algorithm, as an extension of intensity-based filtering augmented with vertical height information, dynamically adjusts filter parameters by combining the height and intensity information of the point cloud, effectively filtering out snow noise while preserving environmental features. In our experiments, the DVIOR algorithm was evaluated on several publicly available adverse weather datasets, including the Winter Adverse Driving Scenarios (WADS), the Canadian Adverse Driving Conditions (CADC), and the Radar Dataset for Autonomous Driving in Adverse weather conditions (RADIATE) datasets. Compared with both the mainstream dynamic distance–intensity hybrid algorithm in recent years, Dynamic Distance–Intensity Outlier Removal (DDIOR), and the representative intensity-based filter LIOR, DVIOR achieved notable improvements: it gained a 10.2-point higher F1-score than DDIOR and an 11.8-point higher F1-score than LIOR (79.00) on the WADS dataset. Additionally, DVIOR performed excellently on the CADC and RADIATE datasets, achieving F1-scores of 87.35 and 86.68, respectively—representing an improvement of 19.82 and 36.9 points over DDIOR and 4.67 and 17.95 points over LIOR (82.68 and 68.73). These results demonstrate that the DVIOR algorithm outperforms existing methods, including both distance–intensity hybrid approaches and intensity-based filters like LIOR, in snow noise removal, particularly in complex snowy environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.702
Threshold uncertainty score0.650

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronicsSame topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207