MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414247990 · doi:10.53555/3s8psq79

Fish Waste Meal As A Sustainable Protein Source In Climbing Perch (Anabas testudineus) Diets: Implications For Growth, Feed Utilization, Water Quality, And Economic Viability

2023· article· en· W4414247990 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Prasenjit Maity, Joydev Maity

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAquaculture Nutrition and Growth
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFish mealFeed conversion ratioPerchProtein efficiency ratioAnabas testudineusMealWeight gain

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of conventional protein sources such as fishmeal and soybean meal in aquafeed raises sustainability, environmental, and economic concerns. This study evaluated the efficacy of Fish Waste Meal (FWM) as an alternative protein source in the diet of Climbing Perch (Anabas testudineus) through a 60-day feeding trial. The present study evaluated the effects of incorporating fish waste meal (FWM) at varying inclusion levels (0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%) into the diet of Anabas testudineus on growth performance over a defined feeding period. Key growth parameters, including final body weight (FBW), specific growth rate (SGR), and feed utilization efficiency, were analyzed to assess the nutritional viability of FWM as an alternative protein source. Results demonstrated a clear improvement in growth parameters with increasing inclusion levels of FWM. The FBW increased from 8.54 ± 1.01 g in the control group to a maximum of 10.78 ± 1.01 g in the FWM75 group. Weight gain significantly improved (P = 0.001), ranging from 3.27 ± 0.35 g in the control to 6.33 ± 0.40 g at 75% inclusion. The feed conversion ratio also improved significantly, decreasing from 3.04 ± 0.10 in the control to 1.79 ± 0.16 in the FWM75 group (P = 0.001), while the protein efficiency ratio (PER) increased from 0.78 ± 0.08 to 1.25 ± 0.08 (P = 0.001). The SGR improved from 0.93% to 1.39% per day, though not statistically significant (P = 0.280). The feed intake remained consistent across treatments, and the survival rate was 100% in all groups. The findings highlight that fish waste meal, particularly at 75% inclusion, enhances growth performance and feed efficiency in A. testudineus without compromising survival or feed intake. This underscores the viability of FWM as an environmentally friendly, nutritionally rich, and cost-effective alternative protein source in aquafeed formulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.216
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.105 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Survey in Fisheries SciencesSame topicAquaculture Nutrition and GrowthFrench-language works237,207