MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414259247 · doi:10.52609/jmlph.v5i4.215

Assessment of Learning Style Preferences Among Medical Students and Their Correlation with Academic Performance in First-Year MBBS Subjects

2025· article· en· W4414259247 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Medicine Law & Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicLearning Styles and Cognitive Differences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLearning stylesPreferenceStyle (visual arts)CorrelationAssociation (psychology)Cognitive stylePreference learningVisual learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background:Learning styles represent different approaches to learning that can influence how effectively students assimilate information. The VARK model classifies learning styles into four modalities: Visual, Aural, Read/Write, and Kinesthetic. Recognising students' preferred learning styles may help to optimise educational strategies, particularly in demanding fields such as medical education. Aim:This study aimed to identify the predominant learning style preferences among first-year MBBS students and to evaluate any associations between these preferences and their academic performance. Methods:A cross-sectional survey was conducted among second- and third-year medical students who had completed their first-year MBBS examinations. Data on age, sex, and subject-specific marks were collected, and the VARK (Version 8.01) questionnaire was administered to determine individual learning style preferences. Statistical analyses compared the distribution of preferred learning style by sex and by academic achievement, with significance assessed using appropriate software. Results:Among 126 participants (70 females, 56 males), quadmodal (multimodal) was the most commonly reported preference (33.3%), followed by unimodal (33.3%), bimodal (16.7%), and trimodal (16.7%) learning styles. The Kinaesthetic modality was the predominant unimodal preference. No significant differences in learning style distribution were observed between male and female students. Academic performance did not significantly correlate with any specific learning style; high and low performers exhibited similar distributions of learning preferences. Conclusion:Multimodal learning styles are the most prevalent among first-year MBBS students, and there is no significant association between learning style preference and academic achievement. These results underscore the value of incorporating diverse teaching methods to accommodate various learning preferences within the medical curriculum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.637

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it