MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414262025 · doi:10.3389/froh.2025.1655450

Oral health care challenges in individuals with severe mental illness: a qualitative meta-synthesis

2025· review· en· W4414262025 on OpenAlex
Tameem Afroz, Joseph Beyene, Khaleda Zaheer, Mohamad Alameddine, Mohammad Hayatun Nabi, Mohammad Delwer Hossain Hawlader, Ahmed Hossain

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Oral Health · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicDental Health and Care Utilization
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQualitative researchOral healthMental healthHealth careMental health careOral health careMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Individuals with severe mental illness (SMI) experience significantly higher rates of poor oral health, including dental caries, periodontal disease, and edentulism, compared to the general population. This meta-synthesis investigates the challenges faced by individuals with SMI in managing oral health and potential solutions. Methods: A comprehensive literature search (2010-2024) was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for any-language studies. The meta-synthesis involved systematic article selection, quality appraisal, and thematic data extraction/synthesis. Results: From 1,698 records, 101 full-text articles were reviewed; 11 met the inclusion criteria. Findings consistently demonstrate a high prevalence of poor oral health outcomes (caries, tooth loss, periodontal disease) among individuals with SMI, alongside significantly lower engagement in oral hygiene (e.g., toothbrushing) and dental care-seeking behaviours. Key barriers include financial constraints, dental anxiety, medication side effects (notably xerostomia), and low oral health awareness. Stigma and inadequate dental professional training in mental health further impede access. Proposed solutions emphasise integrating oral health education into psychiatric rehabilitation, enhancing communication between dental and mental health providers, and developing tailored support systems. Evidence suggests a bidirectional relationship between oral and mental health. Conclusion: This meta-synthesis confirms a stark oral health disparity for individuals with SMI, driven by suboptimal hygiene, medication effects, limited health literacy, and formidable access barriers compounded by financial hardship and stigma. Addressing this requires urgent, coordinated integration of mental and oral healthcare through co-located services, interdisciplinary collaboration, and tailored interventions. Future research must prioritise quantitative studies to elucidate causal pathways and long-term impacts, rigorously examining the roles of gender, geography, environment, and comorbidities. Bridging this divide is an essential public health imperative demanding systemic reform. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024516535, identifier PROSPERO [CRD42024516535].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.442
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it