MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414263193 · doi:10.1101/2025.09.13.676015

Phagocytic podosomes enable efficient uptake of <i>Candida auris</i> by primary human macrophages

2025· preprint· en· W4414263193 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Konstantin Sopelniak, Rawan Batlouni, Pasquale Cervero, Stefan Linder

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphatic System and Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHospital for Sick ChildrenDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsInternalizationPodosomePhagosomePhagocytosisCytoskeletonIntracellularImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The yeast Candida auris is an emerging pathogen of steadily increasing importance. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of C. auris uptake and intracellular processing by immune cells such as macrophages is thus critical for counteracting the spreading of respective infections. Here, we show that phagocytosis of C. auris cells by primary human macrophages involves the formation of dot-like F-actin-rich structures at C. auris -containing phagosomes that we characterize as phagocytic podosomes. We analyse the composition, architecture, and dynamics of these structures, showing that they constitute a specific and highly dynamic adaptation of the phagocytic actin network of macrophages. We also show that disruption of phagocytic podosomes is associated with reduced internalization of C. auris cells and delayed maturation of respective phagosomes. Our data provide novel insights into the uptake mechanism and cytoskeletal rearrangements upon internalization of Candida by immune cells, while also challenging the dogma of a generally uniform and continuous actin network within phagocytic cups. At the same time, we identify C. auris as the first pathophysiologically relevant target whose internalization involves the formation of phagocytic podosomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicLymphatic System and DiseasesFrench-language works237,207