MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Каменный летописец и памятные плиты XVII века в псковской церкви Михаила Архангела с Городца

2025· article· ru· W4414268312 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueАрхеология и история Пскова и Псковской земли · 2025
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPsycholinguistics and Behavioral Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConsecrationQuarter (Canadian coin)EpigraphyConnection (principal bundle)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

В статье впервые представлены результаты изучения четырех сохранившихся каменных плит и надгробий последней четверти XVII в. из псковской церкви Михаила Архангела с Городца. Памятники эпиграфики рассматриваются в связи с историей храма, его перестройками и судьбами прихожан. Отмеченные в мемориальных текстах люди принадлежали к приказным подьячим и посаду. Две плиты относятся к роду подьячего Псковской приказной избы Андрея Максимова сына Шандина. Особенное значение имеет памятный летописец 1696 г., являющийся шедевром камнерезного мастерства псковитина посадского человека Ивана Степа нова сына Щетинкина. В нем сообщается о строительстве и освящении Архангельского храма, а также о его благоустройстве в 1690-е годы усердием псковского купца Н. И. Ямского и церковного старосты Гавриила Свечника. Благодаря их попечению окончательно сложился архитектурный облик Михайловской церкви, ставшей в 1720-е годы соборной. The article presents for the first time the results of a study of four survived stone slabs and tombstones from the last quarter of the 17th century. from the Pskov Church of Michael the Archangel from Gorodets. The monuments of epigraphy are considered in connection with the history of the church, its reconstruction and the fate of the parishioners. The people mentioned in the memorial texts belonged to the clerks of the Prikaz and the townspeople (Posad). Two slabs belong to the family of Andrey Maksimov, son of Shandin, a clerk of the Psk ov Prikaz. Of particular importance is the memorable chronicler of 1696, which is a masterpiece of the stone-cutting skill of the Pskovite townsman Ivan Stepanov, son of Shchetinkin. It reports of the construction and consecration of the Archangel Church, as well as its improvement in the 1690s by the zeal of the Pskov merchant N. I. Yamsky and the church warden Gavriil Svechnik. It is thanks to their care, the architectural appearance of St. Michael’s Church, which became a cathedral church in the 1720s, was finally formed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.572
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0070.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.378 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it