MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414270652 · doi:10.3828/eci.2025.7

Dánta Polaitiúla Neamhfhoilsithe Éadbhaird de Nógla ( <i>c.</i> 1700–82)

2025· article· ga· W4414270652 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Keith Ó Riain

Bibliographic record

VenueEighteenth-Century Ireland · 2025
Typearticle
Languagega
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicScottish History and National Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArgonContext (archaeology)Layer (electronics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Achoimre Díríonn an t-alt seo ar naoi ndán pholaitiúla le hÉadbhard de Nógla. Is é aidhm an ailt solas a chaitheamh ar dhearcadh polaitiúil an Nóglaigh agus an chaoi ar léirigh sé a thuiscint ar imeachtaí polaitiúla ó na daichidí go dtí na hochtaidí san ochtú haois déag. Ní chuirtear a dhánta ar Chogadh na Seacht mBliana san áireamh sa phlé seo, áfach, toisc go bhfuil siad sin in eagar ag údar eile cheana féin. Pléitear ceithre dhán ar Shéarlas Éadbhard Stíobhart agus ar chúrsaí polaitiúla na hEorpa, chomh maith le dán amháin ar Chogadh Quebec i Meiriceá Thuaidh. Déantar plé anseo ar amhrán grá agus polaitiúil ar Mháire Treasa, Banríon na hOstaire, den chéad uair. Ag tús na 1770idí chum an Nóglach dán polaitiúil ina bhfuil macalla de stíl an fhile, Eoghan Rua Ó Súilleabháin, mar aon le hamhrán macarónach a léiríonn scil an fhile sa dá theanga. Scríobh de Nógla aisling pholaitiúil amháin ag deireadh a shaoil ina léiríonn sé a dhílseacht don Seacaibíteachas agus a thugann tuiscint ar leith dúinn ar a chumas mar fhile. Déantar scrúdú ar an aisling sin mar chuid den aiste seo, chomh maith.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score0.415

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1170.049

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEighteenth-Century IrelandSame topicScottish History and National IdentityFrench-language works237,207