MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414274213 · doi:10.1139/cjfr-2025-0045

Impact of <i>Ligustrum lucidum</i> invasion on the structure and functioning of coastal dry forests: a case study from Argentina

2025· article· en· W4414274213 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Julieta Sol Paronetto, M.V.E. Díaz Villa, M. Fernanda Cagnone, Santiago R Carrizo, Nora Madanes, Guillermo Goldstein, Mariela V. Lacoretz, Piedad M. Cristiano

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Forest Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSecretaría de Ciencia y Técnica, Universidad de Buenos AiresUniversidad de Buenos AiresConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
KeywordsUnderstoryBasal areaPhotosynthetically active radiationCanopyLeaf area indexEcosystemBiomass (ecology)Specific leaf areaPlant litter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Ligustrum lucidum invasion of Argentinian forests has significantly altered their structure and functioning. This study assesses and compares structural variables (tree density, sapling density, basal area, and understory cover) and functional variables over time (leaf area index (LAI), fraction of photosynthetically active radiation (fPAR), relative growth rate (RGR), and net primary productivity (NPP)) through field measurements in preserved, partially invaded and invaded dry forests in natural reserve “El Destino”, Buenos Aires province. Results show that the high L. lucidum RGR enhanced light-use capacity of invaded forests, evidenced by an increase in tree density, a 50% higher LAI and consistently elevated fPAR compared to preserved forests. However, the expected NPP increase was not observed. Invaded forests intercepted over 95% of solar radiation year-round, suppressing understory development and produced a dense leaf litter layer. The linear relationship between LAI and canopy height highlighted vertical structure’s role in light interception. Furthermore, the high density of L. lucidum saplings in preserved forests and the presence of dead native trees in invaded forests suggest competitive displacement toward monospecific stands of L. lucidum. These findings enhance our understanding of how L. lucidum reshapes ecosystem structure and function in these native forests, providing insights for forest management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.660
Threshold uncertainty score0.921

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Forest ResearchSame topicPlant Taxonomy and PhylogeneticsFrench-language works237,207