MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414279645 · doi:10.3390/cancers17183039

Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer in Patients with a History of Surgery for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

2025· article· en· W4414279645 on OpenAlexaff
Atsushi Okato, Kosei Miura, Mio Nakajima, Hirokazu Makishima, Takanobu Utsumi, Koichiro Akakura, Hiroyoshi Suzuki, Masaru Wakatsuki, Hiroshi Tsuji, Tomohiko Ichikawa, Hitoshi Ishikawa

Bibliographic record

VenueCancers · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProstate cancerProstateRadiation therapyEnucleationAdverse effectGenitourinary systemTransurethral resection of the prostateLogistic regression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background/Objectives: Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) offers precise dose distribution and enhanced biological effectiveness in localized prostate cancer. However, the safety of CIRT in patients with a history of surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), such as transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term safety and oncological outcomes of CIRT in this population. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted in 74 of 3848 patients with prostate cancer and a history of surgery for BPH who underwent CIRT combined with risk-adapted androgen deprivation therapy between 2007 and 2023. Adverse events were assessed using CTCAE v5.0. Biochemical recurrence-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and risk factors for hematuria with multivariate logistic regression and receiver operation characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: CIRT was generally well-tolerated. Early Grade 2 genitourinary (GU) adverse events occurred in 5.4% of patients, and late-Grade 2 or higher GU events occurred in 8.1%. The cumulative incidence of Grade 2 ≥ GU events remained 10% at 36 months. Compared to holmium laser enucleation of the prostate, a shorter interval between BPH surgery and CIRT initiation and a history of TURP were independently associated with an increased risk of hematuria. Notably, 5-year bRFS was 100% in low- and intermediate-risk groups and 88.6% in the high-risk group. Conclusions: CIRT demonstrates acceptable oncological outcomes and urinary complication rates in patients with prostate cancer and a history of BPH surgery. These findings suggest that CIRT can be a feasible treatment option in this surgically altered population, but careful patient selection, individualized treatment planning, and long-term follow-up are essential. Given the absence of a non-BPH control group, oncological efficacy should be interpreted with caution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancers→Same topicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→