MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414279840 · doi:10.1029/2025gl119254

Four-dimensional generalization of ensemble singular vector: Formulation and experiments with the Lorenz 96 model

2025· preprint· en· W4414279840 on OpenAlexaff
Pin-Ying Wu, Daisuke Hotta, Le Duc

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl Systems and Identification
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNational Central UniversityResearch Organization of Information and Systems
KeywordsGeneralizationSensitivity (control systems)Measure (data warehouse)Singular valueSimple (philosophy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Motivated by the need to extend sensitivity analysis beyond spatial variations to include temporal evolution, we propose a four‐dimensional generalization to the ensemble singular vector approach, termed 4DEnSV. This generalization enables user‐defined norms that flexibly target spatiotemporal evolutions of interest. Experiments with the Lorenz '96 model demonstrate that 4DEnSV successfully identifies perturbations yielding the largest response under a user‐defined norm. By defining norms to reflect temporal objectives, 4DEnSV can extract initial perturbations responsible for specific temporal changes, such as shifts in peak timing. The proposed method offers a novel framework for sensitivity analysis and related applications, particularly for understanding the temporal evolution of weather systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicControl Systems and IdentificationFrench-language works237,207