Linking a Deep Learning Model for Concussion Classification with Reorganization of Large-Scale Brain Networks in Female Youth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Concussion, or mild traumatic brain injury, is a significant public health challenge, with females experiencing high rates and prolonged symptoms. Reliable and objective tools for early diagnosis are critically needed, particularly in pediatric populations, where subjective symptom reporting can be inconsistent and neurodevelopmental factors may influence presentation. Five minutes of resting-state (RS) EEG data were collected from non-concussed and concussed females between 15 and 24 years of age. We first applied a deep learning approach to classify concussion directly from raw, RS electroencephalography (EEG) data. A long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural network trained on the raw data achieved 84.2% accuracy and an ensemble median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.904. To complement these results, we examined causal connectivity at the source level using information flow rate to explore potential network-level changes associated with concussion. Effective connectivity in the non-concussed cohort was characterized by a symmetric pattern along the central–parietal midline; in contrast, the concussed group showed a more posterior and left-lateralized pattern. These spatial distribution changes were accompanied by significantly higher connection magnitudes in the concussed group (p < 0.001). While these connectivity changes may not directly drive classification, they provide evidence of large-scale brain reorganization following concussion. Together, our results suggest that deep learning models can detect concussion with high accuracy, while connectivity analyses may offer complementary mechanistic insights. Future work with larger datasets is necessary to refine the model specificity, explore subgroup differences related to hormone cycle changes and symptoms, and incorporate data across different sports.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".