MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414284961 · doi:10.1061/jhyeff.heeng-6527

NCAmapper: A GIS Model for Accurate Quantification of the Spatiotemporal Changes in Noncontributing Areas and Depressional Storage

2025· article· en· W4414284961 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohamed Ismaiel Ahmed, Alain Pietroniro, Tricia Stadnyk

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hydrologic Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
Topicdemographic modeling and climate adaptation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersGlobal Water FuturesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDigital elevation modelSurface runoffFlood mythHydrology (agriculture)Elevation (ballistics)Hydrological modellingLand useSpatial variabilityDrainage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The North American prairie region is characterized by numerous land depressions, resulting in spatiotemporally variable noncontributing areas (NCAs) that impact runoff translation into streamflow. Current hydrological models address temporal changes in NCA but neglect spatial distribution and geolocation. The only spatial NCA maps available for the prairies were derived by the Prairie Farm and Rehabilitation Association (PFRA) from paper-based contour maps using subjective interpretation of a two-year rainfall event. PFRA maps are therefore static and inadequately represent the dynamic nature of NCAs across different return periods. To address this gap, this study introduces NCAmapper, a GIS-based model relying on digital elevation models to map NCAs dynamically for different runoff events in prairie and arctic regions. Evaluation of NCAmapper demonstrates its capabilities in dynamically representing the spatiotemporal variability in NCAs corresponding to different rainfall events over multiple prairie basins. NCAmapper additionally enhances hydrological model parameterization, aiding practitioners in quantifying effective drainage areas and evaluation of flood vulnerability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.324
Threshold uncertainty score0.307

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hydrologic EngineeringSame topicdemographic modeling and climate adaptationFrench-language works237,207