MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414285776 · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2025.09.015

Explainable Artificial Intelligence–driven Risk Assessment for Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmia and Mortality in Acute Myocardial Infarction

2025· article· en· W4414285776 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Dabei Cai, Tingting Sun, Jun Wei, Li Deng, Ye Deng, Lu Pan, Jingyi Wang, Jianya Huang, Yang Zhang, Qingqing Gu, Qianwen Chen, Qingjie Wang, Anwen Yin, Ruxing Wang, Ling Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Cardiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myocardial Infarction Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHigh-level Hospital Construction Project of Guangdong Provincial People's HospitalUniversity of TorontoGovernment of Jiangsu ProvinceNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNanjing Medical UniversityJiangsu Commission of Health
KeywordsMyocardial infarctionRisk assessmentIntervention (counseling)Patient assessmentPrecision medicineAcute coronary syndrome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Malignant ventricular arrhythmia (MVA) is a severe complication that can occur after acute myocardial infarction, often leading to sudden cardiac death. METHODS: A total of 4471 patients from 2 medical centers were included in this study. The primary endpoint was a composite of MVA and in-hospital death. Seven state-of-the-art artificial intelligence (AI) models were developed and optimized by nested 5-fold cross-validation. Predictive performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, the calibration curve, and the decision analysis curve. RESULTS: Among the enrolled patients, 3456 were assessed for model development and validation and 1015 patients from another medical center were asssessed for external validation. In the validation group, the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model achieved the highest AUROC of 0.792 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.740-0.845) for the composite endpoint. The Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model demonstrated superior performance for MVA prediction (AUROC = 0.827, 95% CI 0.768-0.885), whereas the Random Forest (RF) model outperformed the others for mortality prediction (AUROC = 0.784, 95% CI 0.720-0.848). In the external validation group, the AUROC of the XGBoost model with 15 variables for predicting the primary endpoint event was 0.726. The AUROCs were 0.704 for the LightGBM model with 15 variables for predicting MVA and 0.823 for the RF model with 20 variables for predicting in-hospital death. The Web-based prediction system showed real-time risk assessment capabilities. CONCLUSIONS: Our study presents an interpretable AI framework integrating multimodel analysis for acute myocardial infarction risk management. The system offers clinicians a validated tool for personalized risk assessment that can potentially improve patient outcomes through early intervention strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Cardiology→Same topicAcute Myocardial Infarction Research→French-language works237,207→