MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414289102 · doi:10.18280/rcma.350404

Influence of Gas Flow Rate on the Structural and Optical Properties of TiO2 Prepared by Plasma Jet Technique

2025· article· fr· W4414289102 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M.K. Ibrahim, Bilal K. Al‐Rawi

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des composites et des matériaux avancés · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMaterials Science
TopicZnO doping and properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJet (fluid)Flow (mathematics)Volumetric flow rateAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Plasma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This presents TiO2 thin film, preparation by Plasma Jet at two levels of gas flow for 1.5 L/min and 2 L/min.The properties of the obtained TiO2 were explored.The TiO2 in the thin film was further evidenced by EDX analysis with high Ti to O atomic concentration ratio and no element impurity was detected below the limit.The development of the TiO2 thin film was confirmed by characterization techniques.X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns revealed the presence of peaks related to TiO2 of Rutile phase at planes of 110, 101, 111, 210, and 211 respectively.The different levels of flow of the gas and the effect on the properties of the Nanoparticles as characterised by XRD, FESEM and AFM showed that with the increase in flow the particle size increases and the value of root mean square (RMS) and average roughness also increases.Also for flow levels increasing the absorbance was observed in optical properties, and energy gap value was found as 3.16 for flow level 1.5 L/min and 3.08 for 2 L/min.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.920

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue des composites et des matériaux avancésSame topicZnO doping and propertiesFrench-language works237,207