MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414289325 · doi:10.3390/app151810122

Model Predictive Control of Underwater Tethered Payload

2025· article· en· W4414289325 on OpenAlexaff
Andy Simoneau, Rickey Dubay

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetpointModel predictive controlControl theory (sociology)Controller (irrigation)Payload (computing)StepperControl systemUnderwater

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A fully automated, buoy-based deployment sensor system is being developed to acquire high-quality water column data, and requires a controller to accurately position an array of sensors at various depths. The sensor system will be potentially deployed under rough ocean conditions. Depth is measured by a pressure sensor and adjusted through a rotating drum powered by a stepper motor. The proposed controller uses a model predictive control algorithm, a type of optimal control that predicts system response to optimize control actions used to track a desired variable-depth, setpoint profile. The profile is calculated to ensure smooth motion of the system, preventing motor malfunction. A simplified system model was created and used to simulate an open-loop test and system response. Constraints were applied to the control actions to match the practical limitations of the stepper motor. The simulated results show successful tracking of both a shallow and deep profile. At this stage of testing, the effects of ocean currents are considered by using a simple disturbance that provides the effect of ocean currents. A practical prototype that can implement the model predictive controller was tested on the physical buoy-based system with good control performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score0.208

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied SciencesSame topicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207