MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414290311 · doi:10.30935/ijpdll/17080

Exploring the professional learning and development needs of public primary school teachers in Lagos State, Nigeria

2025· article· en· W4414290311 on OpenAlexaff
Patricia Briscoe, Ajetunmobi Funmilayo

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Professional Development Learners and Learning · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Critical Thinking Development
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchool teachersProfessional developmentEmpowermentContinuing professional developmentQuality (philosophy)Faculty development

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Considering that teachers are the most influential in improving student learning, it is essential to understand their professional learning and development (PLD) needs. This exploratory research examined the existing and desired PLD of primary public school teachers in Lagos State, Nigeria. We used an online survey to collect data, and 87 teachers from six Lagos State school districts participated. The findings provided evidence to direct current and future PLD. We concluded that a re-conceptualization of PLD among teachers would support developing a stronger sense of teacher empowerment and self-efficacy through more self-directed PLD. These recommendations could be beneficial for improving the teaching quality and reducing the learning crisis in Lagos State, Nigeria and beyond.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Professional Development Learners and LearningSame topicEducation and Critical Thinking DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207