Changes in Pain Catastrophizing and Related Outcomes Following a Single-Session Empowered Relief Intervention Delivered by Physical Therapists in Workers with Low Back Pain: A Pilot Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: Low back pain is among the most prevalent pain conditions. Cognitive behavioral therapy reduces the negative effects of low back pain, but access to treatment is limited. Empowered Relief is a 2-hour single-session pain management skills intervention that has demonstrated efficacy at improving pain outcomes in individuals with chronic low back pain. The objectives were 1) to assess the acceptability of Empowered Relief delivered by physical therapists in a sample of French-Canadian workers with low back pain; and 2) to explore changes in pain catastrophizing and other pain-related outcomes following Empowered Relief and physical therapy. Methods: The study was an uncontrolled prospective pilot trial of Empowered Relief and physical therapy for low back pain. Participants were 63 French-Canadian individuals undergoing physical therapy for subacute and chronic low back pain (< 1 year duration). Participants completed baseline measures of demographic and measure of pain catastrophizing, pain intensity, symptoms of anxiety and depression, physical function and pain interference before taking part in a single-session 2-hour Empowered Relief virtual course. Participants then completed a post-class acceptability questionnaire and a 4-week follow-up questionnaire assessing the same measures as baseline. Results: A 2-hour single-session of Empowered Relief demonstrated high acceptability among participants. Pain catastrophizing scores reduced by an average of 28 points, with 90% achieving clinically significant change. Participation in Empowered Relief and physical therapy was associated with reductions in pain intensity, and clinically meaningful improvements in symptoms of anxiety and depression, physical function and pain interference at 4-weeks follow-up. Effect sizes were moderate to large, and the largest changes were found in individuals with subacute low back pain. Conclusion: Empowered Relief, when delivered by physical therapists, may offer a rapid, scalable intervention to complement physical therapy and improve early outcomes in workers with low back pain. The results provide evidence to support a future randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of Empowered Relief delivered by physical therapists for low back pain. Plain Language Summary: Low back pain is one of the most common types of pain, and while therapy can help, many people have trouble accessing treatment. Empowered Relief is a one-time, two-hour class that teaches pain management skills and has been shown to help people with chronic low back pain. This study looked at whether the class was well-received by French-Canadian workers with low back pain and whether there were changes in pain and well-being after Empowered Relief combined with physical therapy. We worked with 63 French-Canadian adults receiving physical therapy for low back pain that had lasted less than a year. They answered questions about their pain levels, physical abilities, and mental health before and after taking the class. They also completed a follow-up survey four weeks later. Participants found the Empowered Relief class highly acceptable. After four weeks, they tended to report less pain, improved mood, and better physical function. The biggest improvements were seen in people with subacute (between 1-3 months) back pain. Empowered Relief is a quick and easy way to teach pain management skills early in recovery. These results suggest that it could be a useful tool to complement physical therapy and help people with back pain feel better faster. Keywords: empowered relief, physical therapy, pain management, low back pain, psychological
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.024 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".