MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414297949 · doi:10.1101/2025.09.15.675172

Ecological and evolutionary insights into the diversification of Atlantic bluefin tuna

2025· preprint· en· W4414297949 on OpenAlexaff
Chloe S. Mikles, Camille Pagniello, Eyal Bigal, Benjamin M. Moran, Jay R. Rooker, Aurelio Ortega, Hugo Maxwell, Robert J. Schallert, Michael Castleton, Molly Schumer, Michael J. W. Stokesbury, Barbara A. Block

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and fisheries research
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
FundersOcean FoundationNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsTunaDiversification (marketing strategy)PopulationForagingFisheries managementPopulation genomicsGenomicsThunnus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY Identifying and preserving biological diversity is fundamental for the management of wild populations. The Atlantic bluefin tuna ( Thunnus thynnus ; ABT) is a vital species to the North Atlantic Ocean ecosystem that is now rebounding from decades of overfishing. This teleost fish is notable for its large body size, unique form of endothermy, and trans-oceanic migrations that enable individuals to move rapidly between spawning and foraging locations. Here we combine high-resolution whole genome sequencing data with spatial and environmental data from electronic tagging to improve our understanding of population structure in ABT. We analyzed whole genome sequences (n=82) from both larvae and adult fish representing the two recognized stocks (western and eastern) of ABT, which originate from geographically distinct spawning grounds. Analyzing these data, we identified 11,181,223 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), a dataset of unprecedented size and resolution. Coverage across the entire genome resulted in increased power in analyses of population structure, patterns of selection, and demographic history between the two recognized stocks. Notably, we report that both neutral and putatively adaptive SNPs are differentiated between populations, and through analyses of F ST outlier SNPs, we discovered candidate genes with potentially adaptive roles. We suggest that both demographic history and oceanographic variation of the spawning grounds have contributed to shaping bluefin tuna genomic diversity. Our results characterize adaptive variation that will be consequential for management decisions and critical for preserving locally adapted populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicMarine and fisheries research→French-language works237,207→