Rapid prediction of adsorbate probability distributions in metal-organic frameworks using graph neural networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are porous crystalline materials assembled from inorganic nodes and inorganic linkers. These materials have garnered significant interest for gas separation and storage applications, particularly because of their porosity and their tunability due to their massive design space. However, navigating such a massive design space poses significant challenges. Atomistic simulation techniques have been applied to accelerate discovery and design of MOFs for various applications. A key property obtained from these simulations is the adsorbate probability distribution (APD). An APD maps the probability of finding an adsorbate molecule in the pore of a MOF at a given temperature and pressure, whose maxima correspond to free energy minima (i.e., binding sites). While APDs and binding sites are not easily accessible experimentally, their generation via simulation is tractable. However, high-throughput generation of APDs still requires long simulation times to converge. A machine learning (ML) model to predict APDs would enable the use of this property in data-driven pipelines to identify high performing materials or binding sites. To date, nobody has attempted to apply ML to the prediction of APDs or binding sites of MOFs. In this work, we present DeepAPD – a ML model which predicts APDs at a given temperature and pressure. As an initial proof of concept, the model has been trained on simple spherical adsorbates such as CH4 and Xe. DeepAPD was found to generate APDs of MOFs at a speedup factor of >105 in comparison to GCMC. An in-depth discussion of training strategies and dataset size/composition on model performance is presented. It was found that the APDs obtained by ML were sufficiently accurate to get a reliable estimation of binding sites in MOFs, particularly binding sites which have high probability. Finally, the transferability of the ML models was investigated by evaluating the performance of the GNN model on a dataset of experimentally characterized MOFs. We have also implemented the DeepAPD inference code into our binding site identification algorithm to facilitate an end-to-end MOF to binding site prediction. Future work will extend these models to more complex guests such as CO2, N2, and H2O.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".