Operational management of multiple energy communities in the energy market: a bilevel optimization-based approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Increasing integration of distributed renewable energy sources necessitates a paradigm shift in power grid management. Energy Communities (ECs), incentivized by European policies, are emerging as key players in this transition by enhancing renewable energy adoption, promoting energy efficiency, and mitigating energy poverty. ECs require advanced coordination strategies to optimize their economic and technical performance, while preserving distribution grid stability and efficiency. In this paper, a novel entity (the EC aggregator), is introduced to coordinate multiple communities for efficient participation in balancing markets, specifically the Demand Response (DR). A bilevel optimization framework is proposed: the high level is a tracking problem of the DR reference power value. Instead, the low level models multiple ECs, each one characterized by different participants and an EC manager; the resulting optimization problems, one for each EC, are transformed using Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions. The decision model has been applied to a case study with real data from the Savona province, Italy. By leveraging distributed energy resources, storage systems, electrical vehicles and flexible loads, the proposed approach maximizes individual and collective self-consumption, while enhancing grid reliability. Results demonstrate the effectiveness of hierarchical coordination in maintaining EC profitability while providing ancillary services to the grid, thus contributing to broader sustainability objectives of modern energy systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".