MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414304240 · doi:10.1016/j.apjo.2025.100245

Does semaglutide increase the risk of non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of emerging evidence

2025· review· en· W4414304240 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAsia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSemaglutideDiabetes mellitusAnterior ischemic optic neuropathyMeta-analysisMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Semaglutide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist widely prescribed for type 2 diabetes and obesity, has recently been linked to rare ocular adverse events, including non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION). Given the growing concerns and limited clarity, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to critically assess the potential association between semaglutide use and NAION risk. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between semaglutide use and the development of NAION. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted via different databases from inception to June 3rd, 2025. A reviewer screened the potential articles against prespecified eligibility criteria. The risk of bias in the eligible studies was then evaluated using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS). Data were then systematically extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: The database search yielded 3539 records, of which 10 research articles investigating the association between Semaglutide and NAION were included in this study. Semaglutide use was associated with a significantly increased risk of NAION compared to control medications, with a pooled hazard ratio of 2.620 (95 % CI: 1.808-3.795, P < 0.001). Risk elevation showed time-dependency, becoming statistically significant after 2 years of exposure. Identified risk factors included older age, male sex, prolonged diabetes duration, elevated HbA1c, diabetic retinopathy, and obesity. Among GLP-1 receptor agonists, semaglutide accounted for 86.5 % of reported NAION cases. Clinical presentations featured optic disc edema, intraretinal fluid on OCT, and crowded optic discs. Cumulative incidence rates were substantially higher in semaglutide users versus non-GLP-1 receptor agonist comparators. CONCLUSIONS: Semaglutide use shows association with increased NAION risk, particularly with prolonged exposure and in patients with predisposing factors. Risk-benefit assessment and targeted ophthalmologic monitoring are recommended while maintaining appropriate therapeutic use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.700
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0130.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it