MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414305899 · doi:10.14307/jfcs117.3.43

Universal Connectedness, Human Consciousness, and Noetic Sciences: Potential FCS and Home Economics Trajectory

2025· article· en· W4414305899 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Family & Consumer Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Sociology, Communication Studies
Canadian institutionsMount Saint Vincent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVanguardRepertoireFamily and consumer scienceTrajectoryPerspective (graphical)Behavioural economics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This opinion piece makes the case for family and consumer sciences (FCS) and home economics to bring noetic sciences and noetic experiences into their repertoire and broaden their minds about (a) human consciousness; (b) subjective, intuitive inner knowing; and (c) universal connectedness. Engaging with noetic sciences is not as anathema as it once was. Respecting noetic experiences’ influence on people’s lives could become a viable trajectory of vanguard FCS and home economics’ philosophical and theoretical musings with the potential to augment research, education, and practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.422
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.016
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Family & Consumer SciencesSame topicEducation, Sociology, Communication StudiesFrench-language works237,207