Guided multi-agent AI invents highly accurate, uncertainty-aware transcriptomic aging clocks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Scientific discovery has long relied on human creativity, with computation limited to analysis. Here we report an AI-guided system, K-Dense, that accelerates hypothesis testing and delivers robust scientific discoveries. Trained on ARCHS4 (57,584 samples, 28 tissues, 1,039 cohorts, ages 1–114), the unified ensemble clock achieved R 2 = 0.854 and MAE = 4.26 years—while uniquely providing calibrated confidence intervals. This self-aware design flags predictions made at transitional or extreme ages, where biological heterogeneity peaks, suggesting clinical utility for uncertainty itself. Development revealed stage-specific markers, including CDKN2A/p16 (senescence), AMPD3 (muscle wasting), MIR29B2CHG (progeroid traits), and SEPTIN3 (neurodegeneration resistance). Sliding-window analysis across 85 overlapping ranges uncovered wave-like shifts in gene importance, showing that transcriptomic aging signatures evolve continuously, not discretely. By transforming biological age assessment from static point estimates to calibrated predictions with explicit uncertainty, this approach establishes reliable and interpretable clocks. Beyond the clock itself, K-Dense demonstrates how guided AI can compress months of exploration into weeks, pointing toward a scalable framework for accelerated scientific discovery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".