PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT IN SURFERS: GUIDELINES FOR HEALTH PROFESSIONALS - PART 2 LOWER QUARTER
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Musculoskeletal injuries in the lower quarter during surfing are primarily associated with the sport's fundamental movements. This movements occur when the surfer is standing on the board, riding the wave. The injuries are typically acute, with severity and complexity varying according to the surfer's skill level and maneuvers performed. The objective of the present study was to conduct an integrative review of studies related to the musculoskeletal assessment of the lower quarter, focusing on physical examinations and functional tests applicable to surfers. This integrative review was carried out through a literature review, evaluating and analyzing papers from national and international journals indexed in the scientific databases Scielo and PubMed. The developement and analysis involved a panel of experts in the field of medicine and surfing health composed of physical educators, physiotherapists and sports doctors. This guideline aims to complement the information presented in the upper quarter article, emphasizing the prevalence of musculoskeletal injuries in the lower quarter among surfers and guiding outpatient assessments. It considers the specificities of surfing and the biomechanical movements involved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it