MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414308013 · doi:10.1097/mco.0000000000001166

Multi-ingredient supplementation for combating sarcopenia and polymorbidity

2025· article· en· W4414308013 on OpenAlexaff
Joshua P. Nederveen, Mats I. Nilsson, Mark A. Tarnopolsky

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle metabolism and nutrition
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityMcMaster University Medical Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSarcopeniaAnabolismResistance trainingSkeletal muscleLean body massMuscle massMuscle strength

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We discuss the premise and potential of multi-ingredient supplements (MIS) in the treatment of complex skeletal muscle (SkM) pathologies, and provide an updated review of literature on nutraceuticals in sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity (SO) management, with an emphasis on single- vs. multi-ingredient protein-based formulations. RECENT FINDINGS: Several meta-analyses have confirmed the synergistic benefits of combining resistance training (RT) with dietary protein supplementation in older adults with sarcopenia or physical frailty, with a potential ceiling effect at 1.5-1.7 g PRO/kg BW/day.Single-ingredient supplements with proven synergism with RT and clinical relevance for sarcopenia treatment include the major milk proteins (whey and/or casein) and creatine monohydrate. Vitamin D 3 , calcium, and/or n -3 polyunsaturated fatty acids are also recommended for mitigating concurrent micronutrient deficiencies, bone loss, and inflammation. More evidence is needed to justify monotherapy with leucine or leucine metabolites over high-quality protein sources.RCTs have demonstrated superiority of whey-based MIS compared to isocaloric and isonitrogenous placebo for enhancing SkM growth in both younger and older persons, including obese and nonobese sarcopenic subgroups, as confirmed by in vivo body composition and/or biopsy sampling.Multi-ingredient formulations containing high-quality milk proteins, creatine monohydrate, vitamin D 3 , calcium, and n -3 polyunsaturated fatty acids may therefore be recommended in the multimodal treatment of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity. SUMMARY: Resistance training is the first-line treatment for musculoskeletal conditions and improves lean body mass, strength, and function in sarcopenia patients. Increased protein intake augments RT-induced muscle anabolism across clinical subpopulations, with recent evidence suggesting superiority of multi vs. single-ingredient protein-based supplements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.453
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic CareSame topicMuscle metabolism and nutritionFrench-language works237,207