Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Brain Gliomas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Brain gliomas are highly infiltrative and heterogenous tumors, whose early and accurate detection as well as therapeutic management are challenging. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to redefine the landscape in neuro-oncology and can enhance glioma detection, imaging segmentation, and non-invasive molecular characterization better than conventional diagnostic modalities through deep learning-driven radiomics and radiogenomics. AI algorithms have been shown to predict genotypic and phenotypic glioma traits with remarkable accuracy and facilitate patient-tailored therapeutic decision-making. Such algorithms can be incorporated into surgical planning to optimize resection extent while preserving eloquent cortical structures through preoperative imaging fusion and intraoperative augmented reality-assisted navigation. Beyond resection, AI may assist in radiotherapy dose distribution optimization, thus ensuring maximal tumor control while minimizing surrounding tissue collateral damage. AI-guided molecular profiling and treatment response prediction models can facilitate individualized chemotherapy regimen tailoring, especially for glioblastomas with MGMT promoter methylation. Applications in immunotherapy are emerging, and research is focusing on AI to identify tumor microenvironment signatures predictive of immune checkpoint inhibition responsiveness. AI-integrated prognostic models incorporating radiomic, histopathologic, and clinical variables can additionally improve survival stratification and recurrence risk prediction remarkably, to refine follow-up strategies in high-risk patients. However, data heterogeneity, algorithmic transparency concerns, and regulatory challenges hamstring AI implementation in neuro-oncology despite its transformative potential. It is therefore imperative for clinical translation to develop interpretable AI frameworks, integrate multimodal datasets, and robustly validate externally. Future research should prioritize the creation of generalizable AI models, combine larger and more diverse datasets, and integrate multimodal imaging and molecular data to overcome these obstacles and revolutionize AI-assisted patient-specific glioma management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".