La pédagogie queer : un état des lieux
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis le militantisme queer datant de la crise du sida dans les années 1980, l’expérience queer a été étudiée travers les théories queer (TQ). Flexibles et critiques, elles s’intègrent à plusieurs domaines scientifiques, incluant celui de l’éducation. À l’aide d’une recension narrative de la littérature, nous souhaitons lier les TQ et la pédagogie pour étudier la pédagogie queer (PQ). Notre recherche exploratoire tente de définir la PQ, à comprendre les différentes conceptions y étant liées et ses applications concrètes. De plus, notre projet permet de catégoriser la mise en oeuvre de la PQ en deux compétences distinctes, soit l’analyse et l’action queer, tout en soulignant les défis d’application qui y sont liées, notamment l’inconfort qu’elles peuvent causer en milieu institutionnel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.031 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.017 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".