De l’état éducateur en matière sexuelle à une citoyenneté sexuelle libérale (et informée) ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article se propose d’articuler des perspectives socio-historiennes et philosophiques en éducation sur l’éducation à la sexualité (EAS) pour, d’une part, penser sa pratique scolaire comme un élément important d’une formation ambitieuse des individus à une citoyenneté sexuelle conçue de manière à la fois libérale et informée, et aussi pour mieux comprendre ce qui en complique et en entrave à ce jour la mise en oeuvre optimale. Pour ce faire, nous croisons également des perspectives synchroniques et diachroniques sur l’EAS en France, son évolution et les défis qu’elle rencontre. L’analyse repose sur une approche intertextuelle croisant textes institutionnels, travaux scientifiques et matériaux empiriques issus d’une enquête de terrain. Nous formulons pour finir quelques pistes axiologiques (les principes et concepts qui peuvent la régir au mieux dans une démocratie contemporaine) et compréhensives à partir de l’EAS (ce que son étude révèle plus globalement sur nos sociétés et leurs écoles).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".