MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414311855 · doi:10.1080/19359705.2025.2502351

Socioenvironmental and mental health determinants of alcohol use among Black sexually minoritized men and transgender women: Findings from the N2 cohort study

2025· article· en· W4414311855 on OpenAlexaff
Cho‐Hee Shrader, Christopher M. Ferraris, J Dupont Frechette, Christoffer Dharma, Anthony F. Santoro, Deborah S. Hasin, William C. Goedel, Mainza Durrell, Hillary Hanson, Moira McNulty, Dustin T. Duncan, J. Schneider, Justin Knox

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of LGBTQ+ Mental Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesCenters for Disease Control and PreventionNational Institute on Drug AbuseNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and AlcoholismNew York State Psychiatric Institute
KeywordsMental healthPsychological interventionTransgenderHeavy drinkingTransgender womenCohort studyAlcoholSubstance useHuman sexualityQualitative research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: We aimed to identify socioenvironmental determinants of alcohol use among Black sexually minoritized men (SMM) and transgender women (TW). Method: Data were from the Neighborhoods and Networks (N2) cohort study among Black SMM and TW (01/2018-08/2020). We used stepwise negative binomial regression to identify associations with alcohol use. Result: =24±4 years), 68% reported past month alcohol use. Adverse childhood experiences (IRR=1.10;95%CI=1.03-1.18), GAD-7 (IRR=1.03;95%CI=1.00-1.07), and community violence (IRR=1.06;95%CI=1.02-1.10), were positively associated with alcohol use. Conclusion: Multilevel alcohol reduction interventions can consider reducing community violence and increasing access to mental health services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.140

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of LGBTQ+ Mental Health→Same topicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy→French-language works237,207→