MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414314084 · doi:10.1093/ee/nvaf086

Volatiles from endangered <i>Braya longii</i> (Brassicales: Brassicaceae) influence oviposition choice by <i>Plutella xylostella</i> (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae)

2025· article· en· W4414314084 on OpenAlexafffundabout
N. Kirk Hillier, Luise Hermanutz

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Entomology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandAcadia University
FundersEnvironment CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaAcadia University
KeywordsEndangered speciesBrassicaceaeDiamondback mothKey (lock)PEST analysisPlutellaHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Long's Braya, Braya longii Fernald (Brassicales: Brassicaceae), is an endangered plant in the family Brassicaceae found only on the Limestone Barrens of the Great Northern Peninsula of Newfoundland, Canada. Conservation of this species hinges on management of pests, diseases, and disturbances, which threaten their small populations. In particular, a global agricultural pest, diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella L. (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), causes significant damage to persistence of B. longii and contributes to possible extinction. This study investigates if there are key volatiles that attract P. xylostella to B. longii, thereby contributing to the pest's impact on the plant. Headspace collections, GC-MS, and GC-EAD revealed a unique volatile profile for B. longii, with (E)-2-nonenal as a key volatile that elicited strong antennal responses in P. xylostella. Oviposition assays confirmed female preference for E2-nonenal-baited radishes. This finding has implications for P. xylostella pest management, highlights the importance of chemical ecology in both crop protection and endangered species conservation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental EntomologySame topicGenomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stressFrench-language works237,207