MassVision: An Open-Source End-to-End Platform for AI-Driven Mass Spectrometry Imaging Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) combines spatial and spectral data to reveal detailed molecular compositions within biological samples. Despite their immense potential, MSI workflows are hindered by the complexity and high dimensionality of the data, making their analysis computationally intensive and often requiring expertise in coding. Existing tools frequently lack the integration needed for seamless, scalable, and end-to-end workflows, forcing researchers to rely on local solutions or multiple platforms, which hinders efficiency and accessibility. We introduce MassVision, a comprehensive software platform for MSI analysis. Built on the 3D Slicer ecosystem, MassVision integrates MSI-specific functionalities while addressing general user requirements for accessibility and usability. Its intuitive interface lowers barriers for researchers with varying levels of computational expertise, while its scalability supports high-throughput studies and multislide data sets. Key functionalities include visualization, segmentation, colocalization, data set curation, data set merging, spectral and spatial preprocessing, statistical analysis, AI model training, and AI deployment on full MSI data. We detail the workflow and functionalities of MassVision and demonstrate its effectiveness through different experimental use cases such as exploratory data analysis, ion identification, and tissue-type classification on in-house and publicly available data from different MSI modalities. These use cases underscore MassVision's ability to seamlessly integrate MSI data handling steps into a single platform and highlight its potential to reveal new insights and structures when examining biological samples. By combining cutting-edge functionality with user-centric design, MassVision addresses longstanding challenges in MSI data analysis and provides a robust tool for advancing the user's ability to achieve biologically meaningful insights from MSI data. MassVision is freely available via 3D Slicer (documentation: https://SlicerMassVision.readthedocs.io/). The in-house MSI data have been made publicly available in MetaboLights with the identifier MTBLS12868.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.021 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".