MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414320366 · doi:10.2196/72124

Effectiveness of Antivirals Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir and Molnupiravir in Viral Sepsis: Retrospective Cohort Study

2025· article· en· W4414320366 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Teddy Tai Loy Lee, Alex Chang-Hao Lyu, Sunny Ching Long Chan, Crystal Ying Chan, Tsz Fung Yip, Luke Y. F. Luk, Joshua W. K. Ho, Kevin Wang Leong So, Omar Wai Kiu Tsui, Mei Lam, S Lee, Tafu Yamamoto, Chak Kwan Tong, Man Sing Wong, Eliza Lai‐Yi Wong, Abraham Ka Chung Wai, Timothy H. Rainer

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Public Health and Surveillance · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInnovation and Technology Commission
KeywordsRetrospective cohort studyCohort studyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)MEDLINEEpidemiologyPandemic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Viral infections, including those leading to sepsis, are common but often overlooked in clinical practice, yet the treatment strategies for viral sepsis remain inadequately defined. Objective: This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of antivirals nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and molnupiravir in the treatment of culture-negative sepsis. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted across public hospitals in Hong Kong. We included patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between February 22, 2022, and June 30, 2023, who had no secondary bacterial or fungal infections. Propensity score matching was used to assess the efficacy of the antivirals nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and molnupiravir in patient subgroups with or without organ dysfunction at hospital admission, including circulatory shock, respiratory failure, acute kidney injury, coagulopathy, acute liver impairment, a composite of all organ dysfunctions, or no organ dysfunction. Key outcomes were in-hospital mortality and length of stay, reported as hazard ratios (HR) and mean differences, respectively. Results: The study included 15,599 COVID-19 patients with a mean age of 75.1 (SD 15.9) years. Molnupiravir treatment was associated with a significantly lower risk of mortality in patients in both the presence of any organ dysfunction (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.96) and without organ dysfunction (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.15-0.56). Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir was associated with decreased mortality with respiratory failure (absolute risk difference: 9.5%, 95% CI 6.26-12.72) and without organ dysfunction (HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.05-0.56). Antivirals also reduced the length of hospital stay; nirmatrelvir-ritonavir reduced length of stay in respiratory failure by an average of 3.37 (95% CI 2.32-4.42) days, acute kidney injury by 7.25 (95% CI 2.97-11.52) days, and coagulopathy by 7.04 (95% CI 2.99-4.05) days. Molnupiravir reduced the length of stay in acute kidney injury by an average of 6.7 (95% CI 2.39-11.08) days and coagulopathy by 5.68 (95% CI 1.20-10.16) days. Conclusions: Antivirals reduced mortality among hospitalized COVID patients, with the greatest reduction observed in patients without organ dysfunction. Antivirals were also effective in reducing the length of hospital stay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Public Health and Surveillance→Same topicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research→French-language works237,207→