MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414321362 · doi:10.1101/2025.09.16.25335903

Neurocomputational modelling for characterizing neurocognitive pathophysiology in clinical high risk for psychosis

2025· preprint· en· W4414321362 on OpenAlexaff
Andreea O. Diaconescu, Colleen E. Charlton, Zheng Wang, Milad Soltanzadeh, Jennifer R. Lepock, Alban Voppel, Lena Palaniyappan, John D. Griffiths, Michael Kiang

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsDouglas Mental Health University InstituteCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisinhibitionNeurocognitivePsychosisSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Prepulse inhibitionInhibitory postsynaptic potentialAbnormalityExcitatory postsynaptic potential

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The N400 semantic-priming event-related potential (ERP) is attenuated in schizophrenia and in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHRP); however, the circuit mechanisms linking this abnormality to functional outcome remain unclear. Methods We recorded 32-channel EEG while 46 CHRP outpatients and 38 demographically matched healthy controls (HC) performed a word-pair priming task (80 related, 80 unrelated pairs; prime-to-target stimulus-onset asynchronies [SOA]=300ms or 750ms). Twenty-six CHRP participants were reassessed after one year. N400 difference waves (unrelated–related) were fit with a connectome-constrained Jansen–Rit neural-mass model in 200 cortical parcels. Local gains, synaptic time constants and effective connectivity parameters were optimised with the WhoBPyt framework, and principal-component trajectories of the inferred excitatory–inhibitory | E − I | balance were analysed with partial least squares. Results Under the long-SOA (750ms)/unrelated condition, CHRP showed a sharply elevated early | E − I | peak at 70–100ms relative to HC (p=0.0004), driven by greater pyramidal excitatory gain (parameter A), stronger excitatory-to-pyramidal coupling and faster inhibitory decay, indicating cortical disinhibition. The amplitude of this early peak predicted poorer social functioning at one-year follow-up (r=–0.56,p=0.003). Conversely, in the short-SOA (300ms)/related condition CHRP exhibited a larger N400-window | E − I | peak (350ms) associated with enhanced inhibitory-to-pyramidal feedback (parameter C3) and lengthened inhibitory decay (parameter b); this putative compensatory inhibition correlated with better functional outcome (r=0.60,p=0.001). Network-level analyses revealed an amplified early sensory-network burst and attenuated default-mode and salience-network responses, consistent with a systems-wide shift toward disinhibition in CHRP. Conclusions Computational modeling demonstrates that N400 abnormalities in CHRP arise from temporally specific E–I imbalances: early cortical disinhibition that forecasts functional decline and a later inhibitory reinforcement that may confer resilience. These time-resolved E–I metrics constitute low-burden, mechanistically interpretable biomarkers for stratifying psychosis risk and guiding early intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies→French-language works237,207→