Feasibility, utility, usability and acceptance of a multimodal telemonitoring for COVID-19 patients in general practitioners practices in Germany: a mixed methods study with patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, infected outpatients were at risk of declining at home without themselves and their general practitioner (GP) noticing, above all due to silent hypoxemia. To support patients in quarantine, telemonitoring solutions were developed for primary care in several countries. However, evidence on patient perceptions of COVID-19 telemonitoring in primary care settings remains limited. This prospective study evaluates COVID-19 outpatients' experiences with and perception of the usability, utility and acceptance of an app-based telemonitoring in Germany, identifying key conditions for its successful implementation. METHODS: To support home-isolated COVID-19 patients remotely, eight GP practices in Germany implemented a multimodal telemonitoring system. Telemonitoring consisted of an app with connected sensors to remotely measure vital signs and symptoms, with data transmitted to a GP telemedicine platform. Between January to December 2021, 34 COVID-19 outpatients participated in telemonitoring. Telemonitoring duration was 28 days for acute infection or up to 12 weeks for prolonged/post-acute symptoms. Afterwards, patients participated in a mixed-methods evaluation about their experiences consisting of semi-structured telephone interviews and an in-house questionnaire. Interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis, questionnaires were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: =19-74, comorbidities present = 13/34). Patients generally viewed telemonitoring as feasible and beneficial, with high acceptance rates and a perception of the system as valuable and reassuring support during illness. Participants, even those with limited prior experience in recording health data, successfully managed the monitoring process. Key insights included patient expectations regarding GP data access, underscoring the importance of integrating patient perspectives into the design process of future telemonitoring solutions. Connectivity issues with sensors occasionally disrupted data collection. Generally, the results emphasize the importance of comprehensive onboarding and support structures to optimize telemonitoring effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that app-based telemonitoring in primary care is a feasible, well-accepted intervention for COVID-19 outpatients, with patients perceiving it as valuable, supportive and reassuring. Findings emphasize the critical role of patient-centered design and strong support structures for successful telemonitoring integration into primary care. Lastly, these findings underscore the value of telemonitoring in pandemic preparedness, ensuring timely detection of patient deterioration and strengthening primary care resilience. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00024604). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Goethe University Frankfurt (No. 20-1023, 18.01.2021), and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".