MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414322403 · doi:10.1109/jsteap.2025.3610564

Integrated Sensing and Communication (ISAC) Transceiver: Hardware Architectures, Enabling Technologies, and Emerging Trends

2025· article· en· W4414322403 on OpenAlexaff
Ke Wu, Yasser Bigdeli, Seyed Ali Keivaan, Jie Deng, Pascal Burasa

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Electromagnetics Antennas and Propagation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Sensor Networks and Detection Algorithms
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKey (lock)SoftwareNoise (video)Reliability (semiconductor)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integrated Sensing and Communication (ISAC)—also known as Joint Radar-Communication (RadCom), Joint Radar-Communication (JRC) and other related variants—has rapidly emerged as a transformative paradigm for future wireless systems. By unifying sensing and communication functions within a shared transceiver framework, ISAC addresses the growing demands for spectral efficiency, multifunctional interplay, situational awareness, and hardware reuse. This convergence is poised to enable emerging and future wireless intelligence-driven applications ranging from intelligent transportation and autonomous factories to beyond-5G and 6G smart self-adaptive networks. This article presents a comprehensive, hardware-centric review of ISAC transceiver technologies. We trace the historical evolution of ISAC systems, survey current transceiver architectures, and analyze key enabling components across diverse frequency bands and application scenarios. Specific focus is given to transceiver design strategies, RF front-end architectures, antenna arrays, and integration techniques. Emerging technologies—such as multi-functional arrays, photonic integration, and reconfigurable intelligent surfaces—are also examined for their role in enhancing ISAC performance and scalability. By synthesizing the current state-of-the-art and highlighting open challenges, this review aims to serve as a valuable reference for researchers and engineers working toward the development of next-generation ISAC hardware platforms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Electromagnetics Antennas and PropagationSame topicDistributed Sensor Networks and Detection AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207