MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414335661 · doi:10.58286/31659

Comprehensive Condition Assessment of Dam Crest Structures Using Multi-Method Non-Destructive Evaluation Techniques

2025· article· en· W4414335661 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuee-Journal of Nondestructive Testing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Health Monitoring Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGround-penetrating radarNondestructive testingEvaluation methodsCrestUltrasonic testingVisual inspectionRadar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a comparative analysis of a multi-modal non-destructive testing and evaluation program in evaluating the condition of concrete elements in two dam structures in Quebec, Canada. For each dam structure, one area, exhibiting varying degrees of deterioration, were meticulously investigated to evaluate the surface and subsurface integrity of the concrete. Visual surveys revealed surface-level defects, including cracks, spalling, and evidence of previous repairs. Subsurface conditions were evaluated through a multi modal non-destructive evaluation program. Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR) was used for rapid screening of the area for potential delamination and voids, particularly in areas with prior repairs. Ultrasonic pulse echo (UPE) was utilized to verify the findings of the GPR scans, providing high-resolution data on internal defects within the top 500 mm. In addition, Impulse-Response (IR) testing was deployed to affirm presence of potential anomalies (voids and delamination) by identifying high-mobility zones. Spectral Analysis of Surface Waves (SASW) was employed to evaluate mechanical properties, revealing variations in shear wave velocity, with lower velocities correlating to compromised material integrity. The main objective of the study was to study the effectiveness of these NDT-E methods in identifying sub-surface anomalies. The findings of this study revealed a good agreement between among between different assessment methods, enhancing confidence in defect detection and material characterization. While much of the concrete was found to be in satisfactory condition, several areas especially those with prior repairs exhibited notable surface and subsurface degradation. The findings emphasize the need for targeted maintenance and repair strategies to mitigate the identified defects and ensure the long-term safety and performance of the dams. This study showed the efficacy of combining multiple NDE techniques for detailed, non-invasive assessments of dam infrastructure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.665
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.452
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it