MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Combined rehabilitation of patients after acute cerebrovascular accident in the early recovery period: the role of osteopathic correction

2025· article· en· W4414338862 on OpenAlexaff
T. G. Makichyan, D. I. Melkosyants

Bibliographic record

VenueRussian Osteopathic Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsOsteoporosis Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRehabilitationNeurorehabilitationStroke (engine)BiofeedbackRandomized controlled trialQuality of life (healthcare)Sports medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction . Acute cerebrovascular accident (ACA) circulatory disorders are the cause of persistent motor disorders in the form of impaired static-dynamic functions and psychoemotional disorders, which significantly affect the quality of life of patients. Disability due to stroke ranks 1st among all causes of disability in Russia and is an important medical and social problem requiring a comprehensive rehabilitation approach. The biofeedback method (biofeedback therapy), as one of the modern methods of hardware rehabilitation, demonstrates its effectiveness in research on restoring lost functions in patients who have undergone ACA. One of the methods of neurorehabilitation of patients with ACA is osteopathic correction (structural, visceral, cranial), which improves the regulation of static and dynamic postural balance. The aim of the study : to study the effectiveness of osteopathic correction on the formation of a motor stereotype in the rehabilitation of patients with ACA in the early recovery period. Materials and methods . The study was conducted at the Biomechanics Laboratory of the Moscow Scientific and Practical Center for Medical Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine from November 2019 to March 2021. A randomized controlled prospective study involved 155 patients with stroke aged 40 to 75 years who underwent rehabilitation for 10 days in hospital. The patients were divided into two groups by simple randomization. Patients of both groups received standard preventive therapy for stroke (antiplatelet, lipidlowering, hypotensive therapy), as well as 10 sessions of physical therapy and Bio-feedback therapy. The main group underwent osteopathic correction after the first and fifth sessions of Bio-feedback therapy, while the control group underwent standard treatment without osteopathic correction. All patients underwent stabilometry, osteopathic examination, and a 10-meter walking time. Results . The inclusion of osteopathic correction in the course of biofeedback therapy in patients in the early recovery period improves the function of postural control according to stabilometry ( p <0,05) compared with standard treatment. Somatic dysfunctions at the global and regional levels were revealed in both groups. Among global-level somatic dysfunctions, rhythmogenic cranial impairment was identifi ed, which was also the dominant somatic dysfunctions in these patients. Conclusion . Osteopathic correction in patients with ACA in the early recovery period improves the static-dynamic characteristics of the motor stereotype.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.431

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussian Osteopathic JournalSame topicStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryFrench-language works237,207